Politicians' obsession is people's suffering

I don't feel like writing about this topic at all, but the whole world is just commenting. A politician has instigated this chaos. His words, "Nothing personal, just business," in the interest of the truth, are my favorite. Since his election, he has overestimated his abilities. If it were a TV show, I'm sure it would be the most watched. But doing politics involves making choices for a better life for people. Let's start with his positive statements. He admitted things out loud while they were taboo for normal people. He made shocking threats against other countries and those in close proximity. At the very least, he demonstrated that the words "democratic state" concealed nothing but manipulation. For as long as humanity can remember, there has always been a division of people. Be it according to religions. Be it by skin color. Be it because of the different languages ​​they speak. Be it because of the different interpretations of communism and capitalism. “No man fights against freedom; man fights most against the freedom of others.” These words are from Marx. People from all over the world came to America in search of quick riches. Their ancestors came from various parts of the world. As far as I know, much of the Mayan civilization was destroyed during the Spanish conquest. Currently, the local population of Indians are some of the poorest in the country. Let's examine the actions of this politician. A leading politician always has advisors. This is due to his inability to have a comprehensive understanding of all issues. His success depends on the advice of these people. In my first book, I have a story about what kind of friends a person should have. There, at the end of the short story, I prove that it is better to have one smart friend than a hundred friends. The same applies to the leading politician. At least one advisor with a unified perspective is more effective than ten advisors with conflicting views. This is due to the fact that you are presented with a variety of perspectives. One pulls back, the other pushes forward. and the third in the skies. I don’t know if the president’s statements were his or his advisers’, but they were disastrous. First, he proposed the acquisition of Canada and Greenland. He revealed his aggressive ambitions. He accused Europe of robbing him and, at the same time, supported nationalist parties in certain countries. He demonstrated that Europe was on the right track and that its fragmentation was necessary to weaken it. He demonstrated this by encouraging each country in Europe to preserve its national identity and avoid identifying itself as European, as Americans are doing now. He declared a trade war on the entire world, imposing his opinion. This statement is consistent with his actions over the past few years. Buy weapons from me; otherwise, terrible things await you. Yes, over the years he oppressed Arab countries by controlling oil. He continues to do so. But against Russia, something is not working. Why? The main challenge for American presidents is managing relations with China and, in the near future, India. The vice president made a statement. “We borrow from peasants to buy goods from them.” It literally sounds insulting. However, I see it as self-deprecation. It's not only a matter of not having money but also not having any goods. Where is your wealth? In fact, I was once asked how rich I was, and instead of answering, I asked him how many children he had. He informed me that he has four children. I answered him that he is twice as rich as me. Then he asked me how to understand that a person is rich. I answered him. A person is rich when, in addition to himself, he helps others. The more people he has helped, the greater his wealth. Then I also mentioned to him people who have invented vaccines that have helped many people. I brought up the names of Mother Teresa, Buffett, who has generously donated over 100 billion dollars to charity, and Bill Gates, who actively combats diseases like malaria and tuberculosis in impoverished nations. Similar to large corporations whose services or products are in high demand, they generate profits based on this demand. Customs tariffs are imposed to achieve specific goals. Theoretically, it is possible to achieve some results over time. But at what cost?  Ordinary people will pay. I am not an economist or a financier, but I have consulted many people to increase their assets. I would only impose tariffs on American companies. Let them distribute and optimize their production. How can a company be considered American if it doesn't produce anything in America? Then I would give the green light to companies that invest in America without taxes for the next 15 years, and they would invest themselves, and there would be no loss of trust. Each country should at least take 10 percent care of its farmers. What is the purpose of sitting down at a table with an expensive plate, fork, spoon, table, napkin, and only half a plate of food? Neither the TV nor the dishwasher will feed you. According to statistics, at least one billion people go to bed half-starved, half the world still does not have clean drinking water, and we set out to conquer Mars. The president's decision to withdraw from the Green Deal is the biggest mistake he has made. In recent years, people have blamed China for air pollution, despite the fact that they produce more solar panels and wind turbines than any other country. They want to, and they don't agree; I have no words. I argue that climate change is the greatest threat to humanity, and it is undoubtedly the most significant problem. We are already starting to feel its effects. Because of the nonsense we read, we don't have much time to think about it. However, when we experience the pain firsthand, our understanding of it deepens. The second biggest issue is the withdrawal from the human rights charter, which was done just to accept a person who is currently ordering others to kill. I am sure that if you ask ordinary Jews, they are against what their leader is doing. The actions and statements of their president are not shared by the average American. By withdrawing from these two important charters, he undermines the human right to life. Who would trust you? Even if world trade stops, it's equal to ten percent, and the world will somehow survive it. Instead of ten coffees, they'll drink nine, and there's no problem. However, such an arrangement is not ideal for the average American citizen.  Who will pay a high price? You can't just threaten. Better try to do something meaningful, and it will make you rich. You can't be richer than a person with ten children if you only have two. As we know, all 10 children will eat two eggs each, and that's 20 eggs. Your two children will eat two each, a total of 4 eggs. The value of a fiat banknote is subjective and based on perception, not intrinsic worth. In the end, this person will always be richer than you. We must accept this reality, work together, and be glad to be alive today, as we may not wake up tomorrow. One of my books contains a quote. We can't bring back the past, but we can reward the future as we want. The average citizen decides who to vote for, and then we wonder how they spend our tax money and work against our interests.