Tell me what your friends are like, and I'll tell you what you are like

We’ve all heard it. It might come from our parents, a particularly judgmental aunt, or even just float around in the collective consciousness: “Tell me who your friends are, and I’ll tell you who you are.” It’s a powerful saying, suggesting a direct connection between our social circles and our character. Is it truly that straightforward? The saying fundamentally implies that our identity is partially shaped by the company we maintain. It’s a reflection of the idea that we gravitate toward people who share our values, interests, and even our flaws. Think about it: are you more likely to spend your spare time with someone who enjoys hiking, reading, and volunteering if you enjoy these activities yourself? Probably.  The proverb emphasizes the power of influence. Our friends inevitably shape us. Their habits, perspectives, and lifestyles constantly influence us. If your friends are ambitious and driven, you’ll likely feel the urge to strive for more in your life. Conversely, if your social circle is prone to negativity or engages in risky behavior, it can lead to negative consequences. It’s not about losing your individuality but about recognizing the subtle but powerful ways our friends can shape us.  This proverb also speaks to the idea of ​​shared values. We tend to befriend people who see the world in a similar way, who possess similar moral compasses. If honesty, integrity, and kindness are important to you, you'll likely seek friends who embody these qualities. It's not always a conscious decision, but rather a natural tendency to surround ourselves with people who reinforce our beliefs. However, we should not accept this statement as absolute.  While our friends certainly influence us, it’s important to remember that we are individuals with our own unique identities. Taking the saying too literally can lead to oversimplification and judgment. First, friendships are complicated. People are multifaceted, and we can become friends with someone for various reasons beyond a complete alignment of values. Maybe you connect with someone because of a shared love of a particular hobby, even if you disagree on other issues. Maybe you appreciate their sense of humor, even if their lifestyle is different from yours.  Second, judging someone solely based on their friends can be unfair. Everyone deserves to be judged based on their actions and character, not just by association. It is entirely possible to have friends from different backgrounds and perspectives without compromising your integrity. Judging a book by its cover (or a person by their friends) can lead to inaccurate and potentially harmful assumptions.  Ultimately, people change. Friendships evolve, and occasionally we outgrow certain relationships. Someone you were once close to may take a different path in life, and that's okay. Holding on to a friendship simply because of history or obligation can be more damaging than letting it go.  What is the ultimate conclusion? “Tell me who your friends are, and I’ll tell you who you are” makes a valid point about the influence of our social circles. It reminds us to be mindful of the company we keep and the values ​​they represent. It’s important to remember, though, that the previous statement is a generalization, not an absolute truth. We are all individuals with the capacity to choose our paths, regardless of who our friends are. Use this saying as a gentle reminder to cultivate positive and supportive relationships, but don’t let it become a rigid yardstick for judging yourself or others. Ultimately, the most important thing is to live with integrity and kindness, regardless of what anyone else may think.

With Your Vote, you contribute to the future of your money.

I am interested in the movement of money and the fundamental factors. I am definitely not a stock player who buys today and sells tomorrow. But I visit various groups and see them arguing and looking for a quick buck. Many people will say you should do fundamental analysis. Most people believe that you should be proficient in both fundamental and technical analysis. There are numerous specialists in the field. For me, it is important to choose from 3 to 10 stocks at a maximum. You should allocate up to 50 percent of your portfolio to your three favorite stocks, with the remaining stocks allowing you to average the risk. Everyone quotes Mr. Buffett, but their actions make them want to get rich if they can right now. Looking at Mr. Buffett's portfolio, you can see that he has been buying and holding for years, and his patience has paid off. There are both good and bad moments. I also think that by investing, you have really already chosen; you should hold for years. What causes stock prices to fluctuate constantly? The factors that cause these fluctuations are demand and supply. Demand leads to an increase in supply. And when there is no demand, they go down. But what makes this scenario happen? One is the media; the other is the company's profits. The last factor, perhaps the most important, is politics. Politics is not only the most important factor, but it also plays a significant role in determining the consequences. Some big players (analysts) in the media may be seeking to create a bit of volatility with their statements. This is aimed at generating a slight increase in revenue for their clients. The company's income is primarily impacted by the second option. A poor service or product can significantly impact the company's income. Regulatory obstacles. Competitiveness. If the service is unsatisfactory, the responsibility lies with them. Competitiveness is now a factor in unfair competition. Regulatory hurdles, however, remain the most significant factor. Finally, we come to the politicians. Politicians ultimately determine the destiny of billions of people worldwide. How, for example, in the case of friction between two countries, are entire businesses affected economically? A company close to the politicians enjoys a subsidy. Government contracts that support large revenues. Yes, in case of major financial crises, the politicians are still to blame because they did not do their job. When it comes to an epidemic, it's already the responsibility of God. In conflicts between countries, politicians are often held responsible. Unexpectedly, a group acquires weapons. We're back to discussions about regulation or proposals for laws to outright ban guns. Perhaps consider whether aligning with the company you are concerned about might enhance your financial situation. When you vote, consider the type of people you are supporting—it's not personal. Even with your vote, you contribute to the future of your money.