You can't expect those who don't understand your work to appreciate your work.

You can’t expect those who don’t understand your work to appreciate your work; it resonates with a universal truth about human perception and the inherent challenges of seeking validation. It speaks to the fundamental disconnect that can occur when people try to assess or value something they lack the necessary framework to understand.  At its core, the quote emphasizes the importance of understanding as a prerequisite for appreciation. This implies a deeper recognition of the effort, skill, and dedication that went into a particular task or creation. However, this understanding is not automatic. It requires a certain level of knowledge, experience, or at least a willingness to learn about the topic at hand. The quote suggests that expecting true appreciation from those who are unfamiliar with the nuances of your work is unrealistic. This is not necessarily a condemnation of these people; rather, it is an acknowledgment of the limitations of human perception. Imagine an experienced programmer showing his or her complex code to someone with no programming experience. While the uninitiated observer may recognize that something complex is going on, they are unlikely to grasp the elegance of the solution, the challenges overcome, or the enormous amount of time devoted to the project. Similarly, a layperson may admire a finished painting, but only an artist can truly appreciate the techniques used, the subtle choices of color, and the artist’s struggles to capture a particular vision. This principle extends beyond professional skills. Think of hobbies and passions. A dedicated gardener might invest hours meticulously cultivating a rare orchid. To someone who sees only “another flower,” the effort may seem disproportionate to the outcome. However, someone with horticultural knowledge will understand the plant’s unique needs, appreciate the gardener’s dedication, and recognize the accomplishment in seeing the orchid bloom. The quote has significant implications for how we approach communication and seek feedback. Rather than seeking validation from a broad audience, it encourages us to reach out to individuals with the necessary expertise or understanding. Sharing your work with peers, mentors, or people with a vested interest in the field is more likely to lead to constructive criticism and genuine appreciation. This focused approach can be invaluable for growth and improvement. The quote also forces us to consider our own biases and limitations when evaluating the work of others. Before we make a judgment, we need to ask ourselves whether we have the understanding necessary to appreciate the effort and skill put forth. Are we making assumptions based on superficial impressions, or are we truly engaging with the work on its own terms? This level of self-awareness can foster greater empathy and more informed opinions. There is a potential pitfall, however. A quote should not be used as an excuse to dismiss all criticism or to create an echo chamber of self-affirmation. While it is important to seek feedback from informed sources, it is equally important to remain open to alternative perspectives, even from those who may not fully understand the intricacies of your work. Constructive criticism, even when delivered by someone without specific expertise, can sometimes reveal blind spots or suggest alternative approaches. The key is to understand whether the criticism is rooted in genuine engagement or simply a lack of understanding. The quote from Manners in the Great Kingdom serves as a valuable reminder that appreciation often depends on understanding. It encourages us to consider our audience, direct our communication effectively, and cultivate self-awareness when evaluating the work of others. While seeking validation is a natural human desire, understanding where to look for that validation and how to interpret the feedback we receive is crucial to personal and professional growth.